In Russia, some people begin to treat the inhabitants of Khrushchev like ethnographers and anthropologists about the residents of the Amazon Selva – they distance the “savages” and strengthen their unnatural customs and extensions in the camping magazine. In Russia, some people begin to treat the inhabitants of Khrushchev like ethnographers and anthropologists about the residents of the Amazon Selva – they distance the “savages” and strengthen their unnatural customs and extensions in the camping magazine.
Now in “progressive” circles there are many people who are able to write off everything on the legacy of the “scoop”, which, in their opinion, found themselves extremely viable and even after two decades continues to puzzle a humanoid landscape.
Nevertheless, after all, I also sent throughout the Soviet time all existing problems tried to write off on “long -standing spots of capitalism”. And after the USSR ordered a long time to live, public “cosmetologists” began the same merciless and unsuccessful war with the “owls” outrageous unexpuncts.
In principle, there is neither “scoop” nor “old spots of capitalism”. There is Russian civilization, which can be stylistically redistributed under the pressure of various circumstances, acquiring the features of Russia of the pre -revolutionary, Stalinist state, Russia of the Brezhnev, Yeltsinsky power, Russia Putin. However, its essence, in general, remains unchanged.
The first trial houses appeared in Moscow back in 1948. Lagutenko for the design of Khrushchev earned the hero of social labor, nevertheless, he, as it became known, borrowed the ideas of small -sized apartments. It turns out that panel buildings from reinforced concrete plants were the first to build the French – after the end of World War II. And samples of social housing are planned by the Germans: back at the beginning of the century, they came to the decision that for normal life, a person will have enough 9 square meters of housing.